We start at the listing,
not the landing page
Publisher, permissions, version history. We look for a software record before a trading name becomes a claim about an app.
Browse 26 app checksSearch result ≠ authenticated software
Most writing about trading apps begins where the brand wants it to begin: with the promise. This desk begins with identity. We look for a store listing and other attributable records before treating a website's claims as facts about an app.
When a listing exists, its publisher, privacy declaration, permissions and version history give readers fields to check. Many names covered here have no attributable listing. An absent record leaves the app identity unresolved; it does not by itself prove anything about the business behind the name.
What you will find on this site
Each entry separates what a named website or source says from what can be attributed to the exact app. The source card identifies linked domains and the next record needed to resolve the identity. The text explains why similar names, numerical suffixes and promotional claims cannot fill that gap.
Each entry includes a dated verdict and lists what remains unverified. Limited discovery does not prove that a product does not exist, so an unknown status stays unknown.
What we will not do
We publish no trading signals, manage no money and take no position on whether anyone should trade at all. We do not quote user reviews, because a testimonial you cannot trace is worth nothing. We do not print star ratings we did not collect. We do not invent licence numbers, company names or founding dates to fill a gap in a page, and when a gap exists we leave it visible.
Trading with leverage can cost you more than you put in. Nothing here is advice, and nothing here should be read as a recommendation to open an account anywhere.